Had a FANTASTIC experience with Santa Fe RV who do a nice job of getting customized T@Bs (mine is a CS-S with the Outback axle and front platform/storage box). Threw in a lot of extras, including an anti sway bar and many other goodies. Stayed on the drive back to Denver, so had a chance to enjoy it a bit... nucamp really does a great job!
My worst fear was realized... my 4 cyl. 2017 Subaru Outback won't adequately tow it. I've been reading a lot and some people have said no problem others said no way... it technically towed it; however, it was laboring a lot on any significant hills and even gradual inclines needed a heavy gas pedal and It was laboring. Took double the gas on the way back. If it was just a few trips a year it would be fine... but I plan on taking it out a lot. Very disappointed as I really wanted to keep the Subaru :(
Comments
aka BirdieJane towed by Quinn
PLUS, the jury is still out (re: longevity/durability) on vehicles having a CVT transmission being used for regular towing duties: Will they hold up over time or wear out prematurely? That's one reason I got a Honda Pilot AWD (2016) as it has a very durable/powerful (280HP/262 ft-lbs torque) V6 engine & a strong (and "real") automatic transmission with a towing capacity of 5000lbs (and a 500lb tongue-weight -- I don't think the 6-cyl Subarus even come close. AND, the Pilot has the stronger suspension to handle towing better than any Subaru (as HP is not the ONLY factor determining towing-capacity).
I've contacted Subaru about improving (big time!) their towing specs, but they're still in-denial I guess. They do all this advertising showing people "out in the wild" with their Subarus -- and their "Symmetrical AWD" system IS one of the best -- but absolutely NOTHING re: their Subarus being able to tow anything of consequence to sleep/live in. I asked them how the heck can they advertise "people getting out in nature" yet their vehicles can't TOW any of the RVs people want o take OUT there? Even the SMALL trailers. But Subaru seems to think sleeping in their vehicles is some "adventure" or "trendy" and so it's the answer for everyone -- I assured them, it isn't! Maybe dogs & kids think it'd be fun sleeping in a car, but not adults who can't even stretch-out! Besides, how many people (adults/kids) and dogs can you pack into a Subie anyway? ;-)
Here's one instance where the occupants probably don't mind sleeping in a vehicle...because they're SMALL to begin with:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Vy4kBc92CQ
But really, even these DOGS aren't towing anything very heavy -- like a T@B! ;-)
So who really wants to sleep in their cars (!) when they SHOULD be towing a comfortable travel-trailer instead? Very short-sighted of Subaru and IMO, they're not understanding the American RV market AT ALL. Or that their vehicles SHOULD be able to do what their advertising suggests. But they can't.
Anyway, Subarus (ALL of them) are lightweights when it comes to towing anything serious...so look elsewhere (as you're doing).
But you don't need the (most expensive) Jeep SUV -- a Grand Cherokee -- instead, look at a Cherokee 4x4 (get a Trailhawk version!)...it has a 4500lb towing capacity (and probably a 450lb tongue-weight). AND it's a REAL 4x4 (not an AWD). Although many SUVs have AWD systems nowadays, some (like my 2016 and later Pilot) are superior to most "AWD" SUVs out there because they all don't use the same technology -- some systems are better performers than others. Regardless (and as mentioned) the Cherokees are REAL 4x4 vehicles, and there IS a difference.
But if you want higher than 4500lbs towing capacity (it's always better to have a bit more towing capacity than you NEED), then yes, a Grand Cherokee would be better.
Good luck,
-- BR
Basically, any of the ~3.5L V6/automatic transmission "mid-size" SUVs out there (the AWD versions only I think) are rated to tow 5000lbs (WITH a "towing package" of course). The 2WD versions tow less, at least when it comes to the Pilot. I just went with the AWD Pilot over the AWD Highlander (my final 2 choices on my Short List).
-- BR
I just think a Tacoma would better fit what I need to do.... The infiniti is an amazing SUV but not really built for dogs and camping and dirt roads.
2016 CS S, 2008 Toyota Tacoma
Somerset, VA
2017 T@G XL Max
2017 Toyota Tacoma TRD Sport 4X4 with 6 Sp manual
2017 Honda Pilot v6- 280 HP @ 6000 Torque 262 @ 4700
Ford 3.6 turbo ecoboost v6 310HP @ 5580 Torque 400 @ 2500
Ford 5.0 v8 385 HP @5750 Torque 387 @ 3850
Ford 3.2 turbo 5 cyl diesel 185 HP @ 3000 Torque 350 @ 1500
The Pilot v6 is a non turbo engine and that is why the torque peak is not developed till 4700 RPM. The turbo v6 does much better at only 2500 RPM. The v8 is pretty good with lots of torque but still a peak at 1350 RPM higher than the turbo v6.
The turbo diesel puts them all to shame with 350 lb/ft at only 1500 RPM.That means it will go up a fairly steep grade without downshifting to a lower gear. We towed with a 2009 Pilot and we could not stand the 5000 RPM screaming engine to get to the top of a steep hill. A turbo v6 is better, a v8 is good. A recent test in Car and Driver of 2 identical F150's except Turbo v6 vs 5.0 v8 showed the v8 getting 1 mpg better mileage but most testers preferred the turbo v6 because of the way it went up the hills.
The other thing to remember if you are going to high altitudes is that a turbo engines brings its own atmosphere with it. High altitude has very little affect on it. A non turbo engine will suffer the higher up it goes.
So it was comparing apples to apples: mid-size SUVs to mid-size SUVs, the "generic" V6 ones available presently.
The best TRUCK for towing is whole 'nother story...but sure, they definitely CAN tow plenty...which would be overkill (and more $$$$ spent) for towing a T@B 320 or 400.
It's just that some of us like a SUV so we have "covered" interior space we can use for assorted things vs. less space in a pick-up cab, even a Crew Cab (or similar).
-- BR
Just upgraded to a Ford F-150...why...?
John
2007 T@B
Rockford, IL
Dockguy
2017 Honda Pilot w/ V6, FWD
2016 T@B S Max
Wee3
Jannon, We have a 2015 Max-S and have been towing with a 2012 Subaru Outback 6 speed manual. We had some tense times on long upward stretches and did not even want to attempt in the mountains. We started looking for a different TV. I worked in the automotive field for many years and researched all the options. I did not want Anything with the CVT transmission. After months of research we bought a 2016 Toyota 4-Runner. It came all set up with the complete tow package and has a full frame under it. I can't even tell when I am towing the T@B. Looking forward to many happy camping miles.
Gary
2015 Max-S 2016 4-runner
In 2 years when it comes time to replace my original OEM tires, am putting on Continental TerrainContact A/T tires (also OEM tire-size @ 245/60-18): I like to go out into the desert here occasionally (dirt/gravel roads and sand) and want to take better advantage of the Pilot's excellent AWD system. They should also be better in snow than the current OEM All Season tires, too (for when I visit Colorado).
-- BR
As @KBaggins1 points out it's all about hp and torque for towing assuming the TV's tow package is up to par.
2017 Outbacks are available with a 2.5L 4-cylinder engine which produces 175hp @ 5,800 rpm with 174 lb-ft torque @ 4,000 rpm. Or a 3.6L 6-cylinder that generates 256hp @ 6,000rpm with 247 lb-ft torque @ 4,400 rpm. That is a substantial difference for towing.
There's also plenty of vehicles with 4-cylinder turbo engines that can readily pull a T@B over any terrain.
Our 2014 Ford Escape 2.0L EcoBoost (turbo) generates 240hp with 270lbs-ft torque @ 3000 rpm paired with a 3500 lb factory tow package. T@B 320? No problem.
But even the Subaru 3.6L 6cyl (Boxer?) engines are not up to what the other makers' V6 engines are. While the "generic" 3.5L (+-) V6s of all the other brands of mid-size SUVs can tow 5000lbs (with the tow-package, of course), the best a 6-cyl Subaru can tow with 256HP/247ft-lbs torque is 2700 lbs (as has been mentioned). That's WAY under the V6s. And due to that limit, tongue-weight is WAY less, too.
Of course, people can use whatever vehicle they want to tow with, but personally I'd look for and get something else besides ANY model of Subaru for towing even the smaller TTs we're talking about here -- and I did (got the Honda Pilot). Besides, you not only want a vehicle that can tow the weight you need, you SHOULD get a vehicle that can tow a bit MORE than you need so you have some headroom (a cushion). Again, my choice has that headroom.
As someone else mentioned above, a Ford Transit van, especially upgrading the engine to the 3.5L EcoBoost OR the 3.2L in-line 5-cyl diesel, would make a great tow vehicle for one of the smaller TTs (such as a T2B 320 or 400, Lance 1475 or 1575, Scamp 13 or 16, Airstream Basecamp, etc.) -- or even a larger TT -- but TMK, they don't come in AWD/4x4 so it wouldn't have worked for me. Even if 4x4 could be added-on, the price would likely be higher than I'd want. But the CARGO area inside a Transit to carry spare water, propane, 4-6 large/heavy (300+ Watts each) solar panels, bikes, chairs and other supplies would make a Transit/T@B quite an outstanding boon-docking combo!
-- BR
TV: 2006 Chevy Avalanche LT Z71 aka: WhiteWolf, or 1972 Chevy Custom10 P/U aka: SnarlingWolf
Spokane, Wa.
Eric aka: Lone Wolf
TV: 2006 Chevy Avalanche LT Z71 aka: WhiteWolf, or 1972 Chevy Custom10 P/U aka: SnarlingWolf
Spokane, Wa.
Eric aka: Lone Wolf
....and
horsepower 250@5600 rpm , torque 258@2000-4800 rpm
Lots of power and torque. I have rented a T@B and had no problems towing with the Forester.
P.S. Americans like to overbuild everything.