Problem:
Like
many
T@Bbers before me I find the factory installed 3-Speed Fan a
disappointment and
do wonder at times how NuCamp can work so hard on
construction quality yet continue to install the base model fan like
all the not-so-well-built RVs on the market.
Several
folks have posted about upgrading their 1250 3-speed to a 14-speed
using Fantastic Fan
upgrade kit 7350 which costs about
$150. I'd
prefer to save that money for a future MaxxFan Deluxe (with built in
rain shield). However while outfitting a new
T@B with must haves
(for me) a new fan quickly fell to the bottom of a long Amazon
shopping list.
The Plan:
Use
a
PWM Motor Controller to replace the 3-speed power switch. The
result would be a variable speed fan that can be much quieter than
the original on speed 1 and draws half or less battery current. Plus
installation time is about the same as the 7350 kit, well a little
more to cut & solder wires.
Cost ~ $10 for part +tax.
How To:
Not
my original idea . . . Found a very complete post from 2015 on the
wanderthewest.com/forum. PDF copy attached to this post.
A
minor issue was caused by space limitations not seen on the 2015
Camper installation. T@B roof thickness is thinner (or the PWM Board
used a bit larger). So instead of mounting the PWM Board vertical as
in the article mine is mounted at an angle. It only fit in one
specific orientation so the large heat sinks and capacitors could fit
in the available space.
Early
operation data is very promising. Fan running at a comfortable noise
level, with gentle air flow has a current draw about one third as
high as the standard 3-speed Low Setting [1].
* * Radio Off, Clock of Radio On, Standard baseline current included in the above numbers
The attached article should have everything you need to know. If not ask, I'll attempt to answer.
Comments
PS: also, do you know what the wattage rating is for the controller?
TV: 2005 Toyota Sienna LE (3.3L V6)
RV: 2018 T@B 320S, >100 mods
2024 Ford F150 Supercrew short bed.
https://www.amazon.com/RioRandTM-Upgraded-6V-90V-Motor-Controller/dp/B00F839VNQ
Haven't studied it thoroughly yet, but at this point it's not clear to me whether the function of the fan's reversible direction switch can be preserved with this mod?
Not sure if we've ever really used it for anything but exhausting air.
PS: I've also come across other reviews of PWM type controllers that people tried to use with a Fantastic Fan which didn't work satisfactorily due to a high pitched noise it caused in the fan, so not all are equal apparently. I may try this one.
TV: 2005 Toyota Sienna LE (3.3L V6)
RV: 2018 T@B 320S, >100 mods
2024 Ford F150 Supercrew short bed.
2018 Tab 400
2019 Tundra CM
Wisconsin
TV: 2005 Toyota Sienna LE (3.3L V6)
RV: 2018 T@B 320S, >100 mods
2024 Ford F150 Supercrew short bed.
TV: '17 Colorado V6 Z71 4x4, Tow Package, GM Brake Controller
Adventures: 54 Nights: 341 Towing Miles 43,780
TV: '17 Colorado V6 Z71 4x4, Tow Package, GM Brake Controller
Adventures: 54 Nights: 341 Towing Miles 43,780
TV: '17 Colorado V6 Z71 4x4, Tow Package, GM Brake Controller
Adventures: 54 Nights: 341 Towing Miles 43,780
I did notice that vertical placement you mentioned & how the standoffs will shorten that distance, so it would appear that wouldn't work properly as they show it, as you noted. I do see another way to angle it where components might fit around the plastic standoff, so I may give it a shot & see.
Good point too about the switch contacts - will have to check that. Thanks.
TV: 2005 Toyota Sienna LE (3.3L V6)
RV: 2018 T@B 320S, >100 mods
Additional Pictures & Information
of course
TV: '17 Colorado V6 Z71 4x4, Tow Package, GM Brake Controller
Adventures: 54 Nights: 341 Towing Miles 43,780
TV: 2005 Toyota Sienna LE (3.3L V6)
RV: 2018 T@B 320S, >100 mods
TV: '17 Colorado V6 Z71 4x4, Tow Package, GM Brake Controller
Adventures: 54 Nights: 341 Towing Miles 43,780
2024 Ford F150 Supercrew short bed.
2024 Ford F150 Supercrew short bed.
TV: '17 Colorado V6 Z71 4x4, Tow Package, GM Brake Controller
Adventures: 54 Nights: 341 Towing Miles 43,780
2024 Ford F150 Supercrew short bed.
I also installed my PWM motor controller at an angle, and with the two capacitors & a heat sink straddling the standoff & mounting hole. Even then, I'm not sure it would have fit properly if I hadn't trimmed off & rounded the corners of the circuit board with a cutting wheel on my dremel tool. There weren't any components there, just mounting holes in the corners, but I still sealed the cut edges with hot melt glue to insulate any exposed copper layers in the PCB. I also trimmed & filed the outer corners of the largest heat sink in the corner. Since this board was designed to run a wide range of voltages & currents that far exceed the limits of this fan motor, those trimmed bits would never be needed.
I'm looking forward to being able to run the fan at lower speeds while sleeping, thanks to the much lower noise levels made possible by this variable speed control range from full speed to zero.
TV: 2005 Toyota Sienna LE (3.3L V6)
RV: 2018 T@B 320S, >100 mods
TV: 2005 Toyota Sienna LE (3.3L V6)
RV: 2018 T@B 320S, >100 mods
I measured sound levels using the "Sound Meter" android app, and they ranged from around 27 to 53 decibels between slow & fastest speeds, nearly identical to what I measured with the PWM controller. I would not place much importance on the actual decibel values, but instead on how they compare between the two devices, since it can vary with the microphone used, its placement, etc, but I measured both the same way, so the comparison is valid. The range of measured sound levels was labeled in the app as comparable to being between a quiet library and a normal conversation.
The most noticeable difference in usage was that the useful range of speeds for the rheostat was compressed into the upper approximately 40% of the control knob's rotation range. The lower 60% was a range of very slow speeds, probably too slow to move much air. I also noticed that the knob does not turn smoothly like the PWM does, because of its design where a contact brush is raked across a wire winding around a ceramic "donut", so it feels rather stiff. I'm not sure whether this is an advantage or disadvantage, maybe both, but just an observation.
After a few minutes of testing at various speeds, I removed the rheostat to check for heat. I put my finger on the side of its ceramic body, and it was hot enough that I could only keep my finger on it for less that a second. It was quite hot. I never detected any heat from the PWM, but I would expect that, because it was designed for up to 1000 watts at 15A, so the fan motor's 3A at 12V is near the lowest end of the PWM controller's power range; where as the rheostat was operating well above its power rating of 25 watts.
My vote goes to the PWM controller, even though it may be a bit more work in terms of wiring & fitting into the space.
TV: 2005 Toyota Sienna LE (3.3L V6)
RV: 2018 T@B 320S, >100 mods
TV: '17 Colorado V6 Z71 4x4, Tow Package, GM Brake Controller
Adventures: 54 Nights: 341 Towing Miles 43,780
TV: '17 Colorado V6 Z71 4x4, Tow Package, GM Brake Controller
Adventures: 54 Nights: 341 Towing Miles 43,780
Glad to hear the fan mod proved it's worth for you. I expect it'll be great just for sleeping as well as the power saving aspect.
TV: 2005 Toyota Sienna LE (3.3L V6)
RV: 2018 T@B 320S, >100 mods
2024 Ford F150 Supercrew short bed.