I know this is a late reply, but nonetheless...Horigan said:@Maple_Geek
I don't see how that scheme would work. The baseline charging from the tow vehicle is limited by the wire size through the tow vehicle and trailer, and the output capacity of the alternator. A DC to DC charger is looking to see that the source DC power (TV battery ) is being charged (some voltage above 13V, user defined). Once you start drawing current through the tow vehicle the voltage seen by the DC to DC charger will drop and it will stop charging, then the voltage will recover and it will start charging, then the voltage will drop and it will stop charging, etc. Overall you're trying to extract more power (voltage x current) from the tow vehicle than the current system provides, and that's not really possible. If you want more charging power from the two vehicle, upsize the wires running back to the 7-pin in the tow vehicle. You also need to understand how much current the alternator can put out.
Plus, I don't know how the DC to DC charger would respond to having the input and output connected together. It probably would shutdown.
Where DC to DC chargers shine is raising the voltage above the source power to charge at a higher voltage, say to charge a LiFEO4 battery from a lead acid/AGM battery.

The threads on the cap look fine. The threads on the tank are not continuous (ie gaps without threads so I think it's not the cap that's the problem but I'll check again.Maxcamp8 said:Check the cap and tank for malformed threads if possible. Common in plastic gas cans and other injection molded items. Measure OD and see if you can transfer a cap from another object- gas can or water tank. I've swapped out caps on gas cans all too often.


Just for my clarification, I marked my 2019 400 expansion tank before doing my last flush. I have stayed with Century and not had any issues. When I did my flush and fill 2 years ago I used tap water (many gallons) followed by distilled water before refilling with fresh Century fluid. I believe my flow is like the diagram above so in my case the hookup has not changed. The small and large drains seem reversed in the diagram but NOT the direction of flow.ScottG said:Here's an image from Alde that shows the intended flow of glycol through the expansion tank. It sounds like nuCamp is now hooking these up in reverse. I'm curious to know if there is a reason for the change, or if it makes any practical difference in the operation of the system. Presumably it was designed this way for a reason, but it's not immediately obvious to me what that might be.

The hose from the port on R returns to the Alde and the hose attached to the larger port on L receives fluid from the last convector in the loop.

So when starting the flush with the 12 V pump in my 2019 the flush water is entering on the R hose and pushing fluid thru the Alde and around the loop and out the L hose. In this picture the old glycol is just starting to come out from the L hose below, that hose being attached to the larger port on the reservoir. In the shop vac method the pull would be on the L hose below to drain the system, and the new fluid would be pumped in the R hose.
And as @AnOldUR said, the larger port coming from the convector loop would be a place for any debris in the system to settle and not return to the Alde boiler
